It is a Feeling
... search the concept of empathy introduced into theories of aesthetics in the mid-19th century by artists and philosophers
Empathy in Aesthetics
The concept of empathy, originally termed Einfühlung, or "feeling into," was introduced into theories of aesthetics in the mid-19th century by German philosophers and artists. The term was first used in an aesthetic context by the philosopher Rudolf Lotze in 1858, who described the projection of inner experience into forms, leading to a shared essence with the object. This idea was further developed by the art historian and philosopher Robert Vischer in 1873, who articulated the concept as a physical and psychological response to art, where viewers mentally project themselves into the form of an object, stretching, expanding, bending, and confining themselves to it. Vischer's theory linked aesthetic appreciation to bodily responses, suggesting that certain forms could provoke specific emotional and kinetic sensations, such as a "muscular" empathy tied to the body's "self-motions". This notion of projecting one's internal experience into external forms became a foundational element in German aesthetic theory, influencing later thinkers like Theodor Lipps, who expanded empathy from a concept of aesthetic appreciation to a fundamental basis for recognizing other minds. The term "Einfühlung" was later translated into English as empathy by psychologist Edward Titchener in 1909, marking its formal introduction into English philosophical discourse.
... it should also be noted that the philosopher Martin Buber gave nuance to the concept of empathy by describing the empathic relationship of the I and Thou
Indeed, Martin Buber significantly nuanced the concept of empathy through his philosophy of dialogue, particularly in his seminal work “I and Thou” (1923). While earlier aesthetic theories of Einfühlung focused on projecting the self into objects such as art, Buber shifted the emphasis to “mutual, relational existence”. He distinguished between two fundamental modes of human relationship: the "I–Thou" and the "I–It".
- In an "I–Thou" relationship, individuals meet each other in full presence, mutuality, and directness, recognizing the other’s irreducible uniqueness. This is not mere projection or emotional resonance, but a genuine encounter where both parties are transformed through dialogue and openness.
- In contrast, an "I–It" relationship treats the other as an object to be analyzed, used, or categorized, reducing them to a mere function or quality.
Buber described this relational mode by specialized use of the term "inclusion" (Umfassung), which he differentiated from conventional empathy. Unlike empathy, where one might lose oneself in the other through emotional absorption, inclusion involves “entering the other’s perspective while maintaining one’s own integrity”, fostering a shared, lived experience without analysis.
Thus, Buber elevated empathy from an aesthetic or psychological phenomenon to an ethical and existential stance, grounding authentic human connection in reciprocal presence and respect.
... more recently, has research in the neurology of empathy changed the perception of empathy from a 'soft skill' to a psychological competency -empirically measurable
Recent research in neuroscience has transformed empathy from a perceived "soft skill" into a recognized psychological competency with empirically measurable neural foundations.
Neuroimaging studies have identified specific brain networks involved in empathy, including the mirror neuron system (MNS), anterior insula, inferior frontal gyrus, superior temporal sulcus, and medial prefrontal cortex. These regions are activated during affective sharing and cognitive perspective-taking, allowing researchers to observe and measure empathic responses objectively.
For example:
- Functional MRI studies show that empathic competency correctly identifying another’s emotional state is linked to activity in both the MNS (for shared sensori-motor representations) and mentalizing regions like the medial prefrontal cortex.
- Research demonstrates that empathy can be fractioned into distinct components—“cognitive empathy” (understanding another’s mental state) and “affective empathy” (sharing another’s emotions)—each supported by separable neural networks.
- These neural correlates can be correlated with behavioral measures such as the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) or Empathy Quotient (EQ), providing quantifiable data on individual differences.
Moreover, neuro-developmental studies show empathy emerges early in life and is shaped by both biology and experience, with quality of caregiving influencing its neural development. This scientific validation underscores empathy as a core psychological capacity, not merely a subjective or moral trait.
References: